[ExI] reverse turing test (kinda)

[spike at rainier66.com]

From: extropy-chat <extropy-chat-bounces at lists.extropy.org <mailto:extropy-chat-bounces at lists.extropy.org> > On Behalf Of Adrian Tymes via extropy-chat

Subject: Re: [ExI] reverse turing test (kinda)

 

>>…Something like this is how AI detection programs are trained, I believe… Adrian

 

 

>…OK so which is better at AI detection?  AI detection software or humans?  Can we set up a contest …

 

spike

 

 

 

The problem has been recognized.  AI-detection software is discriminatory against non-native English speakers according to Stanford HAI.  We yankees have long known that it is always easy to tell a non-native English speaker: their English is better than the native.  The non-native speaker has an advantage: they learned English from a text book and an English teacher.  The native learned it from other 4 year olds on the playground.

 

This Stanford HAI study claims that AI-detection software is identifying text written by non-native carbon units as AI more than half the time:

 

https://hai.stanford.edu/news/ai-detectors-biased-against-non-native-english-writers?utm_source=Stanford+HAI <https://hai.stanford.edu/news/ai-detectors-biased-against-non-native-english-writers?utm_source=Stanford+HAI&utm_campaign=b77d978350-Mailchimp_HAI_Newsletter_June+2023_1&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_aaf04f4a4b-b77d978350-199837799> &utm_campaign=b77d978350-Mailchimp_HAI_Newsletter_June+2023_1&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_aaf04f4a4b-b77d978350-199837799

 

Adrian you know what that means.  Them furriners are whooping our yankee asses!  We need to get with the program, set up a team to see whose country can fool AI-detection the most.  I suspect the Indians are going to tough to beat in the AI Olympics.

 

spike

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20230611/3c77d9c9/attachment.htm>