[ExI] Conscious AI or a Zombie?
William Flynn Wallace
foozler83 at gmail.com
Wed Jun 21 15:39:29 UTC 2023
Yes, I am a biological machine and so is an amoeba. bill w
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 9:59 AM Gadersd via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
> If all of this is moving in the direction of giving human rights to
> machines, I think it's wrong.
>
>
> Are you not a biological machine?
>
> On Jun 21, 2023, at 10:17 AM, William Flynn Wallace via extropy-chat <
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>
> If all of this is moving in the direction of giving human rights to
> machines, I think it's wrong. bill w
>
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 8:59 AM Gadersd via extropy-chat <
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>
>> There is nothing wrong with abusing a zombie but abusing a sentient
>> creature is something generally considered wrong. If there is an animal or
>> machine that acts as if it were conscious and we don’t have a way to
>> distinguish acting from the real thing then we had better treat such
>> entities as if they were conscious.
>>
>> > On Jun 21, 2023, at 7:21 AM, BillK via extropy-chat <
>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > How could we distinguish conscious AI from its zombie equivalent?
>> > The idea that consciousness emerges naturally alongside intelligence
>> > could be an anthropocentric distortion.
>> > June 20, 2023 Anil Seth
>> >
>> > <https://bigthink.com/the-future/intelligence-conscious-ai/>
>> >
>> > Quotes:
>> > From the 16th-century golem to the replicants in Blade Runner, stories
>> > of sentient human-like creatures tend to end in philosophical and
>> > existential chaos.
>> > The rapid rise of AI has lent fresh urgency to questions about machine
>> > consciousness.
>> > It is a mistake to assume that intelligence — at least in advanced
>> > forms — is either necessary or sufficient for consciousness.
>> >
>> > Although intelligence offers a rich menu of ramified conscious states
>> > for conscious organisms, it is a mistake to assume that intelligence —
>> > at least in advanced forms — is either necessary or sufficient for
>> > consciousness. If we persist in assuming that consciousness is
>> > intrinsically tied to intelligence, we may be too eager to attribute
>> > consciousness to artificial systems that appear to be intelligent, and
>> > too quick to deny it to other systems — such as other animals — that
>> > fail to match up to our questionable human standards of cognitive
>> > competence.
>> > --------------
>> >
>> > BillK
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > extropy-chat mailing list
>> > extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>> > http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> extropy-chat mailing list
>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20230621/43df56f0/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list