[extropy-chat] nuclear spring

Amara Graps amara at amara.com
Tue Dec 12 14:31:42 UTC 2006

Bill K
>Remember Carl Sagan makes errors just like everybody else.  :)

That's a misleading statement.

Qualitatively, the TTAPS studies were correct. Quantitatively, the
models improved as the data and the dimensionality and the grid resolution
on the models improved. (I don't think that the original computer
models were 3D, for example.)

to sum up:

Yes, the initial predictions were probably wrong.
Yes, the physics was/is probably right.


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list