[ExI] Cold fusion: some new results.
Benjamin Goertzel
ben at goertzel.org
Tue May 8 22:13:00 UTC 2007
Short answer: No.
Read "Excess Heat" ...
On 5/8/07, A B <austriaaugust at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Wouldn't cold fusion be a direct and obvious violation
> of conservation of energy? You could just keep fusing
> the lighter elements and then eventually recover the
> input energy by fissioning (fissing?) the
> heavy-element end products. I know that it requires
> more input energy the heavier the element gets, but
> fat stars manage to do it. That seems more like an
> engineering difficulty rather than an immutable
> fundamental barrier. I don't know enough about it one
> way or another, but I'm really hoping that it can be
> validated. That'd be sweeeet.
>
> Best Wishes,
>
> Jeffrey Herrlich
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast
> with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut.
> http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20070508/345acb7f/attachment.html>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list