[ExI] Who is safe? was Re: Wikileaks
stefano.vaj at gmail.com
Sun Dec 12 14:09:55 UTC 2010
On 12 December 2010 14:44, David Lubkin <lubkin at unreasonable.com> wrote:
> The public discussion here in the US has focused on our Constitution and
> legal principles. But Assange has angered the Powers That Be of assorted
> governments, with differing legal standards, punctiliousness, and comfort
> with extra-judicial violent solutions.
> And some of them have long memories. I suspect he will be at risk for the
> rest of his life.
Unless conspiracy nuts, who are typically angered by seeing a few of their
theories confirmed and therefore banalised, are right when they maintain
that Assance is in truth a CIA or Mossad operative who has leaked
unimportant information in order to distract people from "true" secrets
and/or to obfuscate them... :-D
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat