[ExI] Phil Jones acknowledging that climate science isn'tsettled

natasha at natasha.cc natasha at natasha.cc
Wed Feb 17 19:49:45 UTC 2010

Your observation is irrational.


Quoting Alfio Puglisi <alfio.puglisi at gmail.com>:

> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Natasha Vita-More <natasha at natasha.cc>wrote:
>> Christopher Luebcke writes:
>> "... I just find it sadly ironic, and a dark reflection on the petty,
>> fiercely partisan, politicized nature of what should in fact be a sober,
>> scientific discussion, that a man accused (in the court of political
>> opinion) of fraud should suddenly be taken at his word by those same
>> accusers, when that word apparently agrees with their position."
>> Many of us find it frustrating. Nevertheless the biggest problem and
>> disappointment is that, while everyone seems to annoyed and saddened, there
>> is a lack of intelligent communication between all parties in viewing the
>> situation from diverse perspectives.
>> Max is working to develop a level ground for discussion.  Bravo to him.
> I don't agree. Posting all those links to garbage blogs like WUWT, and
> quoting them like they had any value instead of laughing at them (or
> desperating, depends on the mood), does a disservice to the Extropy list. It
> shows how a group of intelligent people can be easily manipulated by PR
> spin. I find it depressing.
> Alfio
>> Best,
>> Natasha
>> _______________________________________________
>> extropy-chat mailing list
>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat

More information about the extropy-chat mailing list