[ExI] Phil Jones acknowledging that climate science isn'tsettled

Alfio Puglisi alfio.puglisi at gmail.com
Wed Feb 17 18:15:04 UTC 2010

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Natasha Vita-More <natasha at natasha.cc>wrote:

> Christopher Luebcke writes:
> "... I just find it sadly ironic, and a dark reflection on the petty,
> fiercely partisan, politicized nature of what should in fact be a sober,
> scientific discussion, that a man accused (in the court of political
> opinion) of fraud should suddenly be taken at his word by those same
> accusers, when that word apparently agrees with their position."
> Many of us find it frustrating. Nevertheless the biggest problem and
> disappointment is that, while everyone seems to annoyed and saddened, there
> is a lack of intelligent communication between all parties in viewing the
> situation from diverse perspectives.
> Max is working to develop a level ground for discussion.  Bravo to him.

I don't agree. Posting all those links to garbage blogs like WUWT, and
quoting them like they had any value instead of laughing at them (or
desperating, depends on the mood), does a disservice to the Extropy list. It
shows how a group of intelligent people can be easily manipulated by PR
spin. I find it depressing.


> Best,
> Natasha
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20100217/697e1375/attachment.html>

More information about the extropy-chat mailing list