[ExI] Phil Jones acknowledging that climate science isn'tsettled
alfio.puglisi at gmail.com
Wed Feb 17 22:07:57 UTC 2010
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:49 PM, <natasha at natasha.cc> wrote:
> Your observation is irrational.
It's not. The global warming debate only exists because of PR, media and
political spin. The scientific debate was over many years ago. I highly
suggest Spencer Weart's history of global warming science:
> Quoting Alfio Puglisi <alfio.puglisi at gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Natasha Vita-More <natasha at natasha.cc
>> Christopher Luebcke writes:
>>> "... I just find it sadly ironic, and a dark reflection on the petty,
>>> fiercely partisan, politicized nature of what should in fact be a sober,
>>> scientific discussion, that a man accused (in the court of political
>>> opinion) of fraud should suddenly be taken at his word by those same
>>> accusers, when that word apparently agrees with their position."
>>> Many of us find it frustrating. Nevertheless the biggest problem and
>>> disappointment is that, while everyone seems to annoyed and saddened,
>>> is a lack of intelligent communication between all parties in viewing the
>>> situation from diverse perspectives.
>>> Max is working to develop a level ground for discussion. Bravo to him.
>> I don't agree. Posting all those links to garbage blogs like WUWT, and
>> quoting them like they had any value instead of laughing at them (or
>> desperating, depends on the mood), does a disservice to the Extropy list.
>> shows how a group of intelligent people can be easily manipulated by PR
>> spin. I find it depressing.
>>> extropy-chat mailing list
>>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat