[ExI] Weird new way to do physics
spike
spike66 at att.net
Mon Nov 7 02:02:44 UTC 2011
>... On Behalf Of The Avantguardian
Subject: Re: [ExI] Weird new way to do physics
----- Original Message -----
> From: spike <spike66 at att.net>
> > Forget degrees. Think in radians.
>...Thanks for the suggestion, Spike, unfortunately, I am using radians and simply used degrees in my example because I could not find the "pi" key on my keyboard. In any case, you should be one to talk, mister engineer, with your feet, foot-pounds, horse-power, and other English unit nonsense...
Not my feet or pounds. I think metric.
Engineers must be unit-bilingual. I am more comfortable in metric units. The English unit notion of having both a pound mass and a pound force is nonsense. I had a professor who tried to explain the differences in the equations when using metric and English, how and where to insert G in one system but not the other. I proposed a way to do it that works really well: in any problem using English units, step one is to convert all pounds mass to slugs. Then the English and metric equations work the same. Just think of a slug as a big kg, and a pound as a big Newton.
> ...What is horse-power anyway?
746 watts.
>...Are you talking clydesdale-power or shetland pony-power?
Agreed the horse that was used to determine 550 ft-pounds per second was surely a rather flimsy horse. Or had the flu that day. Humans can produce a horsepower in short bursts. Perhaps they meant the amount a horse could do in the long haul. Seems like they would have made it an even 1000 ft-pounds/sec.
>...And whose foot determined the standard foot? The king of England? The guy with the biggest feet when they were building Stonehenge? Puhleez! ;-P Stuart LaForge
You got me pal. I think metric these days.
My MBrain pitch Friday used an acceleration unit you may not be familiar with. Recall that I proposed moving an entire star and planetary system using light pressure from an MBrain. In that sense, the most useful unit of acceleration is light-years per square age, where age is defined as one million years. So a typical sunlike star with an MBrain can create an acceleration of about .03 ly/(age)^2. If that is the case, then .5a*t^2 using a=.03, then t is about 15 ages, or 15 million years, to go a distance of the nearest star.
spike
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list