[ExI] How many transhumanist
atymes at gmail.com
Sun Feb 19 21:17:05 UTC 2012
2012/2/19 spike <spike66 at att.net>:
> Think about this for a minute before you dismiss the notion: the way we
> increase our numbers is by increasing our exposure, and the surest way to do
> that is not to make our ideas more appealing, but rather to make them less
> so. We make the ideas threatening to a particular segment who already has a
> following, such as some widely known and perhaps widely disliked religion,
> then have them criticize transhumanism. We increase numbers by becoming
> controversial, not by becoming appealing. The transhumanists out there who
> have never heard of us will come, regardless of appeal.
> Hollyweird discovered this a long time ago. It was once believed that
> negative publicity is better than no publicity. Now,negative publicity is
> better than positive publicity.
Actually, what you describe here is positive publicity. Hatred that
turns out to
be baseless, or based in the not-popularly-defensible beliefs of a group, does
not say anything bad about the group those words were intended to defame.
More information about the extropy-chat