[ExI] BICEP2 and the Fermi paradox

[Tomaz Kristan]

Anders Sanberg:

> Ok, how do you reach the conclusion that is a bit more possible?

Must be a probability distribution.

First, they (probabilities) can't be equally likely.

Most distributions are falling.

See?


On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 9:24 PM, Anders Sandberg <anders at aleph.se> wrote:

> Tomaz Kristan <protokol2020 at gmail.com> , 12/4/2014 1:59 PM:
>
> Anders Sanberg says:
>
> > one doesn't know much about how nested it could be
>
> If it's possible, that this deepness is say 10, then it is possible,
> that's it 0,also. That we are not in simulation right now. Even a bit more
> possible.
>
>
> Ok, how do you reach the conclusion that is a bit more possible?
>
>
> Anders Sandberg, Future of Humanity Institute Philosophy Faculty of Oxford
> University
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
>


-- 
https://protokol2020.wordpress.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20140412/0c1867ea/attachment.html>