[ExI] any dispute?
rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com
Sun May 10 21:28:53 UTC 2015
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 11:00 AM, William Flynn Wallace
<foozler83 at gmail.com> wrote:
> According to The Week, the Wall Street Journal has reacted to the Chinese
> germline change attempts:
> "Another danger is that the technique will be used to engineer offspring to
> your liking - say, to produce a 6'2" blond, blue eyed son with a 150 IQ.
> That's why it's imperative that scientists and the public establish
> 'widespread agreement about what is desirable' - before it's too late."
### It's telling what that WSJ hack sees as dangerous: High
intelligence, physical health, white racial characteristics. Why
doesn't she warn about the danger of a 6'4 black basketball player
with inhuman dribbling? Why didn't she theorize about actual abuse
that could be committed using genetic engineering of offspring - like
making them pretty, servile, sex-obsessed, with reinforced vaginal and
anal musculature, and STD-resistant, the ideal sex slaves? How about
just making slaves - obedient, easy to feed, good as cannon fodder in
There is something detestable about anybody who professes outrage that
children in the future could have higher IQ and the wrong skin color.
More information about the extropy-chat