[ExI] any dispute?
William Flynn Wallace
foozler83 at gmail.com
Tue May 12 13:48:30 UTC 2015
Re sex slave: I am reminded of the Hogarth before and after images (on
Google Images). Be careful of what you ask for - you just might get it
(and she will wear you out asap and will want more and more and make you
feel so inadequate.....) Actually women can do that now without any
additional features. It's a major cause of impotence in fact. Men will
need some very serious upgrades before thinking about equaling the standard
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Adrian Tymes <atymes at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Rafal Smigrodzki <
> rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com> wrote:
>> ### It's telling what that WSJ hack sees as dangerous: High
>> intelligence, physical health, white racial characteristics. Why
>> doesn't she warn about the danger of a 6'4 black basketball player
>> with inhuman dribbling? Why didn't she theorize about actual abuse
>> that could be committed using genetic engineering of offspring - like
>> making them pretty, servile, sex-obsessed, with reinforced vaginal and
>> anal musculature, and STD-resistant, the ideal sex slaves? How about
>> just making slaves - obedient, easy to feed, good as cannon fodder in
>> future wars?
>> There is something detestable about anybody who professes outrage that
>> children in the future could have higher IQ and the wrong skin color.
> I suspect the attempted (emphasis: attempted) implication was, "someone
> ELSE'S kid could have these characteristics, but yours won't because you're
> too pure/honest/ethical to do this to your kid (or maybe you just admit you
> wouldn't spend this sort of money on your own child), so only the cheaters
> would get this advantage".
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat