[ExI] simulation stat goofiness

Will Steinberg steinberg.will at gmail.com
Fri Sep 18 15:37:58 UTC 2020


Ah yes, the Bun Argument. ;)

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 11:36 AM spike jones via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:

>
>
>
>
>
>
> > *On Behalf Of *Will Steinberg via extropy-chat
> *Subject:* Re: [ExI] simulation stat goofiness
>
>
>
> >... at Spike: I'm shocked that Bostrom et al. have never seemed to address
> this, or what they believe the world of the simulator is like, and whether
> it's probable that the simulator is in a simulation too…
>
>
>
> I bought his book but cannot claim to understand it to any real extent.
> That Nick Bostrom is a clever avatar indeed.
>
>
>
> >… It's a half-assed concept for sure…
>
>
>
> Sure but think of it Will: that concept in itself is something that can
> only really be done in a sim.  Everybody knows that buns come in pairs,
> only pairs, never any other number.  Just trying to imagine having only
> one, we need a sim to help us envision such a thing.
>
>
>
> spike
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20200918/21489d75/attachment.htm>


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list