[ExI] what would any of us have done differently?
Brent Allsop
brent.allsop at gmail.com
Wed Dec 14 01:09:38 UTC 2022
Dang, so sorry to hear. I'll have to reach out to him in person.
In comparison to John Clark's noisy opinion, which wasn't canonized.
Stathis did canonize his very brilliantly argued opinion
<https://canonizer.com/topic/88-Theories-of-Consciousness/8-Functional-Prprty-Dualism>,
and continued to support what became a leading popular consensus camp
supported by some brilliant people. However, functionalism camps continue
to lose support compared to other camps. So even well argued, popular
consensus camps will eventually start to fail compared to better argued
positions Again, all in my not so humble, obviously biased opinion.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 3:42 PM spike jones via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From:* extropy-chat <extropy-chat-bounces at lists.extropy.org> *On Behalf
> Of *Brent Allsop via extropy-chat
>
> >…heck even Stathis is now on the verge of admitting the popular
> consensus functionalists are wrong
> <https://canonizer.com/topic/88-Theories-of-Consciousness/18-Qualia-Emerge-from-Function>,
> right Stathis?... Brent
>
>
>
> Brent I fear Stathis left us in a huff because I was rejoicing in what
> Elon Musk is doing now. Well, I am rejoicing, and I understand why: I
> would be doing the same thing right now. Musk is shining the bright rays
> of sunlight into a filthy and badly infected dark corner. I am cheering
> for the photons. Team bacteria isn’t as happy as I am.
>
>
>
> spike
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20221213/a178df45/attachment.htm>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list