[ExI] enough time has passed...
William Flynn Wallace
foozler83 at gmail.com
Mon Jan 24 20:24:52 UTC 2022
Saying that I support the death penalty totally misrepresents my position.
Since there are no laws restricting the death penalty to egregious cases,
then I do not support it at all in present circumstances. bill w
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 1:00 PM Dave S via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 12:35 PM William Flynn Wallace via extropy-chat <
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>> Why on Earth would you think that I don't understand false positives?
> I misread what you wrote.
>> In fact, they are the reason I don't support the death penalty at all.
>> If there were some egregious case, such as raping and killing a child, I
>> would kill them in some way if the evidence was just about certain.
> You don't support the death penalty at all. Unless the crime is egregious
> and guilt is almost certain. So you do support the death penalty.
> DNA for sure.
> DNA evidence isn't as foolproof as you might think. E.g., identical twins,
> planted evidence, etc.
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat