[ExI] ok this explains it
Adrian Tymes
atymes at gmail.com
Mon May 2 22:30:04 UTC 2022
On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 1:39 PM spike jones via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
> OK so… what if… Twitter human content moderators exist. What do they do,
> and how do they do it? What criteria do they use to determine if they will
> override the moderation software? If Musk makes his filtering algorithm
> public, then he wouldn’t need humans in the loop overriding the software,
> ja? So… out they go adios amigo.
>
Nope. The filtering practice can be considered cyborg: part algorithm,
part human. Even if the algorithm part is open-sourced, it still kicks
back to humans to allow for review. It's a first pass/front line to
greatly reduce human workloads (and respond, at least in extreme cases,
much faster than humans), but it does not entirely eliminate them.
That's how the filtering algorithms I have worked on functioned, and I have
no reason to believe that Twitter is any different.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20220502/1d43e90a/attachment.htm>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list