[ExI] chatgpt test 1: fail
Giovanni Santostasi
gsantostasi at gmail.com
Mon Apr 3 04:36:51 UTC 2023
So the best use for ChatGPT is not to simply ask for an answer to a
question but to play with its ability to gather information and mastery of
language. It is all in the prompts. It is similar to when you use
Midjourney to get your masterpiece. If you tell it "Draw a red car on a
highway". It will do a decent job but nothing to be amazed. If you start to
add instruction about light, style, materials, angles, background and so on
you can get spectacular results. It is a creative process.
Same thing with the answer or with whatever you want ChatGPT to co-create
with you. For example, here is the prompts I used to make ChatGPT write
something that is pro-cryonics (vs what one finds mostly on the internet
that is probably not well informed and based on preconceptions).
It is a pretty good result that would make any cryonic enthusiast proud.
Write an essay on cryonics with the most possible favorable position
towards cryonics (mention some of the criticism but address the advancement
in the field and the possible answers to criticism). Also consider that
even if the chance of revival is small it is better than zero chance, so
according this line of thinking make a case for cryonics.
Title: Cryonics: A Leap of Faith Towards a Second Chance at Life
Introduction
Cryonics is the practice of preserving human bodies at extremely low
temperatures with the hope of future revival. Despite facing criticism and
skepticism, cryonics has made significant advancements in recent years. In
this essay, we will explore the potential benefits of cryonics and address
common criticisms, highlighting the progress in the field and the value of
even a small chance of successful revival.
The Promise of Cryonics
Cryonics is based on the premise that current medical definitions of death
may become obsolete as future technologies enable the reversal of
previously irreversible conditions. By preserving the body at extremely low
temperatures, cryonics aims to halt biological processes, allowing patients
to be revived when advanced medical treatments become available.
Advancements in Cryonics and Related Technologies
Recent advancements in the field of cryonics and related areas have
contributed to the growing optimism surrounding the potential for
successful revival. Developments in cryoprotectants, chemicals that prevent
ice crystal formation during the cooling process, have significantly
improved the quality of preservation. Additionally, breakthroughs in
regenerative medicine, nanotechnology, and artificial intelligence show
promise in providing the necessary tools for repairing and rejuvenating
cryopreserved bodies in the future.
Addressing Criticisms
1.
Irreversible damage: Critics argue that the freezing and thawing
processes involved in cryonics may cause irreversible damage to cells and
tissues. However, proponents point to the successful cryopreservation and
revival of simpler organisms, as well as advances in vitrification, a
process that turns tissues into a glass-like state, as evidence that
minimizing such damage is becoming increasingly achievable.
2.
Technological uncertainty: Another criticism is that the technologies
required for revival may never be developed. While this is a valid concern,
investing in cryonics is a choice made with the understanding that the
probability of revival may be small, but still greater than zero. For some,
even a slim chance of a second life is worth the investment.
3.
Ethical and societal concerns: Cryonics raises various ethical and
societal questions, including the implications of extending human life and
the potential burden on future generations. Addressing these concerns
requires open dialogue and the development of regulations that ensure the
responsible advancement and application of cryonics and related
technologies.
Conclusion
Cryonics offers a unique opportunity for individuals to take a leap of
faith towards a potential second chance at life. While the field faces
significant challenges and criticisms, advancements in preservation
techniques and related technologies provide a basis for optimism. As
society continues to grapple with the ethical implications of cryonics,
those who choose this path do so in the belief that even a small chance of
revival is better than none. As science progresses, cryonics may become a
more accepted and viable option for those seeking to extend their lives
beyond current limitations.
[image: Giovanni Santostasi]
I like what you wrote but get rid of the leap of faith statement, we want
to make the essay sound more scientific, it should be more about a logical
bet, where not zero chance, even if small is better than zero (in
particular because we have only one life).
Title: Cryonics: A Rational Choice for a Second Chance at Life
Introduction
Cryonics is the practice of preserving human bodies at extremely low
temperatures with the hope of future revival. Despite facing criticism and
skepticism, cryonics has made significant advancements in recent years. In
this essay, we will explore the potential benefits of cryonics and address
common criticisms, highlighting the progress in the field and the value of
even a small chance of successful revival.
The Promise of Cryonics
Cryonics is based on the premise that current medical definitions of death
may become obsolete as future technologies enable the reversal of
previously irreversible conditions. By preserving the body at extremely low
temperatures, cryonics aims to halt biological processes, allowing patients
to be revived when advanced medical treatments become available.
Advancements in Cryonics and Related Technologies
Recent advancements in the field of cryonics and related areas have
contributed to the growing optimism surrounding the potential for
successful revival. Developments in cryoprotectants, chemicals that prevent
ice crystal formation during the cooling process, have significantly
improved the quality of preservation. Additionally, breakthroughs in
regenerative medicine, nanotechnology, and artificial intelligence show
promise in providing the necessary tools for repairing and rejuvenating
cryopreserved bodies in the future.
Addressing Criticisms
1.
Irreversible damage: Critics argue that the freezing and thawing
processes involved in cryonics may cause irreversible damage to cells and
tissues. However, proponents point to the successful cryopreservation and
revival of simpler organisms, as well as advances in vitrification, a
process that turns tissues into a glass-like state, as evidence that
minimizing such damage is becoming increasingly achievable.
2.
Technological uncertainty: Another criticism is that the technologies
required for revival may never be developed. While this is a valid concern,
investing in cryonics is a choice made with the understanding that the
probability of revival may be small, but still greater than zero. For some,
even a slim chance of a second life is worth the investment, particularly
considering the finite nature of human existence.
3.
Ethical and societal concerns: Cryonics raises various ethical and
societal questions, including the implications of extending human life and
the potential burden on future generations. Addressing these concerns
requires open dialogue and the development of regulations that ensure the
responsible advancement and application of cryonics and related
technologies.
Conclusion
Cryonics offers a unique opportunity for individuals to make a rational
choice in favor of a potential second chance at life. While the field faces
significant challenges and criticisms, advancements in preservation
techniques and related technologies provide a basis for optimism. As
society continues to grapple with the ethical implications of cryonics,
those who choose this path do so in the belief that even a small chance of
revival is better than none, given the preciousness of life. As science
progresses, cryonics may become a more accepted and viable option for those
seeking to extend their lives beyond current limitations.
On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 9:18 PM spike jones via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Giovanni Santostasi <gsantostasi at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Sunday, 2 April, 2023 9:03 PM
> *To:* ExI chat list <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org>
> *Cc:* spike at rainier66.com
> *Subject:* Re: [ExI] chatgpt test 1: fail
>
>
>
> Spike,
> Try to use colder Temperature when you want more precise answers.
>
> https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/10jxawh/temperature_can_be_used_to_create_unique_content/
> Temperature of 0 gives you more factual answers, temperature of 1 it just
> makes things up, anything in between is a mix of factual and made up stuff.
> Giovanni
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [image: Gregory Jones]
>
> spike: is cryonics a feasible way to achieve immortality?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Cryonics is the practice of preserving human bodies or brains at extremely
> low temperatures with the hope of reviving them in the future when medical
> technology has advanced enough to cure the conditions that caused their
> deaths. While some proponents of cryonics believe that it could eventually
> lead to immortality, there is currently no scientific evidence to support
> this claim.
>
> One of the major challenges of cryonics is the damage that occurs to
> tissues during the freezing and thawing process. While cryoprotectants can
> help reduce this damage, they are not yet able to completely prevent it.
> Additionally, the technology to revive cryonically preserved bodies or
> brains does not yet exist and it is not clear if it will be possible to
> revive them in the future.
>
> Furthermore, there are ethical and logistical challenges associated with
> cryonics, such as the high cost of the procedure, the uncertain legality of
> cryonics in some countries, and the potential inequities in access to the
> technology.
>
> In summary, while cryonics is a fascinating concept, it is not currently a
> feasible way to achieve immortality. The technology and scientific
> understanding required to achieve true immortality are still beyond our
> current capabilities.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> OK, this answer is most annoying, for I think I know the approximate
> source of that third paragraph and I deeply disagree with the premise. I
> might go ask GPT some stuff that I know is likely going to be sourced from
> the Extropian archives, just to see if I or someone I know might have
> partially trained ChatGPT. I asked it about Matrioshka brains, and it made
> a mess of it, oh what a mess it made. I won’t bother posting it, oy vey.
>
>
>
> OK I have the question in mind, and it has to do with Mersenne primes.
> But it will hafta wait until tomorrow. Unlike ChatGPT, I grow weary and my
> biological nature requires nocturnal respite from my endless amusement.
>
>
>
> Is this a cool time to be living, or what?
>
>
>
> spike
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20230402/505ed6da/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 174 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20230402/505ed6da/attachment.png>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list