[ExI] Occam's razor

[Ben Zaiboc]

On 20/01/2023 22:53, bill w wrote:
> Just reading An Immense World, by Ed Jong (author of I Contain 
> Multitudes). Surprisingly, he makes a common error:  he wrote that 
> Occam's Razor meant that the simplest explanation is the best.  
> Totally wrong.  It is as likely to be wrong as any other explanation.
>
> It means that the simplest explanation is preferred because it 
> involves the fewest assumptions (entities, Occam wrote), and as we 
> know, assumptions can be wrong.
>
> Agree?   bill w

Well, it's not so much a matter of agreeing, as a matter of are you 
correct? You are, as far as I understand it.

However:

Which is the simpler formulation of Occam's Razor, "the simplest 
explanation is preferred because it involves the fewest assumptions" or 
"the simplest explanation is the best"?  ;>

Ben
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20230121/4838ff0a/attachment.htm>