[ExI] A test of the US constitution

[John Clark]

On Sat, Sep 19, 2026 at 4:09 AM Ben Zaiboc via extropy-chat wrote:

*> If this press ban in the white house is struck down quickly by the
> courts, the constitution wins. If not, and by whatever means (including
> delaying tactics), the ban takes effect, even temporarily, we have clear
> evidence that the constitution is losing against Trump.*
>

*If I was one of Donald's lawyers and had no moral integrity (but I repeat
myself) I know what the argument I would take before the Supreme Court; the
entire point of the First Amendment is to ensure the free exchange of
information, but no information can be obtained from any of the sounds
emanating from Donald's mouth nor from any of the lackeys that inhabit his
white house, there are only lies and endless repetitions of banalities
(there is a "B" in "dumb", I can tell the difference between a giraffe and
a camel, a man came up to me a big man a strong man yet he had tears in his
eyes and he said to me Sir ...) therefore there is no violation of the
First Amendment. *

* John K Clark*



>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20260920/c8c7a6fe/attachment.htm>