[Paleopsych] Eureka: Ecologist calls for creation of an international panel to assess human behavior

Lynn D. Johnson, Ph.D. ljohnson at solution-consulting.com
Sun Aug 8 18:51:55 UTC 2004


Paul,
Ehrlich has been predicting gloom and doom all his career, and has 
always been wrong.

How is it he doesn't have more humilty?
Lynn

Werbos, Dr. Paul J. wrote:

> At 11:51 AM 8/7/2004 -0400, Premise Checker wrote:
>
>> Ecologist calls for creation of an international panel to assess 
>> human behavior
>> http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2004-08/su-ecf072804.php
>> 4.8.1
>>    Contact: Mark Shwartz
>>    [2]mshwartz at stanford.edu
>>    650-723-9296
>>    [3]Stanford University
>>
>> Ecologist calls for creation of an international panel to assess 
>> human behavior
>>
>>    Stanford University Professor Paul R. Ehrlich is urging fellow
>>    ecologists to join with social scientists to form an international
>>    panel that will discuss and recommend changes in the way human beings
>>    treat one another and the environment.
>
>
>
> Ehrlich came to NSF a couple of years ago.
>
> He wanted to talk about CO2 -- and, implicitly, the big new glorious 
> center at Stanford
> that is supposed to address such environmental problems.
>
> I still remember the experience of hearing the talk.
>
> Initial hope as he said: "we can't just treat this as research into 
> how bad the problem
> is. we need research into what can be done to solve the problem. Thus 
> we need to
> broaden our approach to make it more decision-oriented and 
> crossdisciplinary..."
>
> ..
>
> But then:" So we need to work more with political scientists and 
> lawyers..."
>
> The oil dependency problem looks scarier every time I look one step 
> deeper.
> And it correlates very closely with the CO2 problem. One thing is 
> clear --
> lawyers alone have absolutely no hope of locating the real world here.
> Without some understanding of technologies and numbers it is hopeless.
> Kyoto by itself, for example, is a high-price Gucci fig leaf that 
> covers almost nothing.
>
> Best,
>
> Paul
>
> (not representing anyone...)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> paleopsych mailing list
> paleopsych at paleopsych.org
> http://lists.paleopsych.org/mailman/listinfo/paleopsych
>
>




More information about the paleopsych mailing list