[Paleopsych] Global Research: The Remote Manipulation of the Human Brain

Premise Checker checker at panix.com
Thu Aug 19 15:07:08 UTC 2004

The Remote Manipulation of the Human Brain
Centre for Research on Globalisation
Centre de recherche sur la mondialisation

The Deadly Instruments of the New World Order:
Electromagnetic and Informational Weapons:
Electromagnetic and Informational Weapons
by Mojmir Babacek

[Evaluate this for me, please.]

    Editors Note:

    We bring to our readers this carefully documented review article by
    Mojmir Babajek.

    While the text deals with a number of complex scientific processes,
    the implications of these findings are far-reaching.

    The arsenal of electromagnetic and informational weapons, used to
    manipulate the human mind of targeted individuals or populations, is
    an integral part of the weapons system of the New World Order.

    The US military possesses a sophisticated arsenal of psychotronic
    weapons which could be used both domestically and internationally.

    Electromagnetic and informational Weapons could be used in
    conventional wars theatres, without the knowledge of the enemy.

    It is therefore essential that we not only take cognizance of these
    findings, but we mobilize nationally and internationally against the
    use of brain manipulating technologies.

    Michel Chossudovsky, 5 August 2004

      In October 2000, Congressman Denis J. Kucinich introduced in the
      House of Representatives a bill, which would oblige the American
      president to engage in negotiations aimed at the ban of space based

      In this bill, the definition of a weapons system included:

      "any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means inflicting
      death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the
      biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and
      economic well-being of a person) through the use of land-based,
      sea- based, or space-based systems using radiation,
      electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies
      directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the
      purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of
      such persons or populations(15).

      As in all legislative acts quoted in this article, the bill
      pertains to sound, light or electromagnetic stimulation of the
      human brain.

      Psychotronic weapons belong, at least for a layman uninformed of
      secret military research, in the sphere of science fiction, since
      so far none of the published scientific experiments has been
      presented in a meaningful way to World public opinion.

      That it is feasible to manipulate human behavior with the use of
      subliminal, either by sound or visual messages, is now generally
      known and acknowledged by the scientific community.

      This is why in most countries, the use of such technologies,
      without the consent of the individual concerned, is in theory
      banned. Needless to say, the use of these technologies is
      undertaken covertly, without the knowledge or consent of targeted

      Devices using light for the stimulation of the brain constitute
      another mechanism whereby light flashing under certain frequencies
      could be used to manipulate the human psychic.

      As for the use of sound, a device transmitting a beam of sound
      waves, which can be heard only by persons at whom the beam of sound
      waves is targeted, has been reported in several news media.  In
      this case, the beam is formed by a combination of sound and
      ultrasound waves which causes the targeted person to hear the sound
      inside his head. Such a procedure could affect the mental balance
      of  the targeted individual as well as convince him that he is, so
      to speak, mentally ill.

      This article examines the development of technologies and knowledge
      pertaining to the functioning of the human brain and the way new
      methods of manipulation of the human mind are being developed.

      Electromagnetic energy

      One of the main methods of manipulation is through electromagnetic

      In the declassified scientific literature only some 30 experiments
      have been published supporting this assumption (1),(2). Already in
      1974, in the USSR, after successful testing within a military unit
      in Novosibirsk, the Radioson (Radiosleep) was registered with the
      Government Committee on Matters of Inventions and Discoveries of
      the USSR, described as a method of induction of sleep by means of
      radio waves (3), (4), (5).

      In the scientific literature, technical feasibility of inducing
      sleep in a human being through the use of radio waves is confirmed
      in a book by an British scientist involved in research on the
      biological effects of electromagnetism (6). A report by the World
      Health Organisation (WHO) on nonionizing radiation published in
      1991 confirms that:

      "many of biological effects observed in animals exposed to ELF
      fields appear to be associated, either directly or indirectly, with
      the nervous system" (2).

      Among the published experiments, there are those where pulsed
      microwaves have caused the synchronization of isolated neurons with
      the frequency of pulsing of microwaves. Ffor example, a neuron
      firing at a frequency of 0.8 Hz was forced in this way to fire the
      impulses at a frequency of 1 Hz. Moreover, the pulsed microwaves
      contributed to changing the concentration of neurotransmitters in
      the brain (neurotransmitters are a part of the mechanism which
      causes the firing of neurons in the brain) and reinforcing or
      attenuating the effects of drugs delivered into the brain (1).

      The experiment where the main brain frequencies registered by EEG
      were synchronized with the frequency of microwave pulsing (1,2)
      might explain the function of the Russian installation Radioson.
      Microwaves pulsed in the sleep frequency would cause the
      synchronization of the brain's activity with the sleep frequency
      and in this way produce sleep.

      Pulsing of microwaves in frequency predominating in the brain at an
      awakened state could, by the same procedure, deny sleep to a human

      A report derived from the testing program of the Microwave Research
      Department at the [5]Walter Reed Army Institute of Research states

      "Microwave pulses appear to couple to the central nervous system
      and produce stimulation similar to electric stimulation unrelated
      to heat".

      In a many times replicated experiment, microwaves pulsed in an
      exact frequency caused the efflux of calcium ions from the nerve
      cells (1,2). Calcium plays a key role in the firing of neurons and
      Ross Adey, member of the first scientific team which published this
      experiment, publicly expressed his conviction that this effect of
      electromagnetic radiation would interfere with concentration on
      complex tasks (7).

      Robert Becker, who had share in the discovery of the effect of
      pulsed fields at the healing of broken bones, published the
      excerpts from the report from Walter Reed Army Institute testing
      program. In the first part "prompt debilitation effects" should
      have been tested (8). Were not those effects based on the
      experiment by Ross Adey and others with calcium efflux?

      British scientist John Evans, working in the same field, wrote that
      both Ross Adey and Robert Becker lost their positions and research
      grants and called them "free-thinking exiles" (6). In 1975, in the
      USA, a military experiment was published where pulsed microwaves
      produced, in the brain of a human subject, an audio perception of
      numbers from 1 to 10 (9). Again the possibility to convince an
      individual that it is mentally ill is obvious. The testing program
      of American Walter Read Army Institute of Research, where the
      experiment took place, counts with "prompt auditory stimulation by
      means of auditory effects" and finally aims at "behavior controlled
      by stimulation" (8).

      Let us assume that the words delivered into the brain were
      transcribed into ultrasound frequencies. Would not then the subject
      perceive those same words as his own thoughts?

      And would this not imply that that his behavior was being
      controlled in this way through the transmission of ultrasound
      frequencies? In this regard, the American Air Force 1982 "Final
      Report On Biotechnology Research Requirements For Aeronautical
      Systems Through the Year 2000" states:

      "While initial attention should be toward degradation of human
      performance through thermal loading and electromagnetic field
      effects, subsequent work should address the possibilities of
      directing and interrogating mental functioning, using externally
      applied fields" (10).

      Several scientists have warned that the latest advances in
      neurophysiology could be used for the manipulation of the human

      In June 1995, Michael Persinger, who worked on the American Navy's
      project of Non-lethal electromagnetic weapons, published a
      scientific article where he states:

      "the technical capability to influence directly the major portion
      of the approximately six billion brains of the human species
      without mediation through classical sensory modalities by
      generating neural information within a physical medium within which
      all members of the species are immersed is now marginally feasible

      In 1998, the French National Bioethics Committee warned that
      "neuroscience is being increasingly recognized as posing a
      potential threat to human rights (12). In May 1999 the
      neuroscientists conference, sponsored by the UN, took place in
      Tokyo. Its final declaration formally acknowledges that :

      "Today we have intellectual, physical and financial resources to
      master the power of the brain itself, and to develop devices to
      touch the mind and even control or erase consciousnessWe wish to
      profess our hope that such pursuit of knowledge serves peace and
      welfare" (13).

      On the international political scene, in the last few years, the
      concept of remote control of the human brain has become  a matter
      of international and intergovernmental negotiation. In January
      1999, the European Parliament passed a resolution where it called
      "for an international convention introducing a global ban on all
      developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form
      of manipulation of human beings. (14)

      Already in 1997, nine states of the Commonwealth of Independent
      States (CIS) addressed the UN, OBSE and the states of the
      Interparliamentary Union with the proposal to place at the agenda
      of the General Assembly of the United Nations, the preparation and
      adoption of an international convention "On Prevention of
      Informational Wars and Limitation of Circulation of Informational
      Weapons" (16), (3).

      Informational Weapons

      The initiative was originally proposed, in the Russian State Duma,
      by Vladimir Lopatin (3). V. Lopatin worked, from 1990 to 1995, in
      sequence, in the standing committees on Security respectively of
      the Russian Federation, Russian State Duma and of the
      Interparliamentary Assembly of the Commonwealth of Independent
      States (CIS), specializing in informational security.(3). The
      concept of informational weapon or informational war is rather
      unknown to the world general public. In 1999, V. Lopatin, together
      with Russian scientist Vladimir Tsygankov, published a book
      Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia (3). There we find
      the explanation of this terminology:

       "In the report on the research of the American Physical Society
      for the year 1993 the conclusion is presented that psychophysical
      weapon systemscan be used for the construction of a strategic arm
      of a new type (informational weapon in informational war)"

      Among many references on this subject, we refer to Materials of the
      Parliament Hearings "Threats and Challenges in the Sphere of
      Informational Security", Moscow, July 1996, "Informational Weapon
      as a Threat to the National Security of the Russian Federation"
      (analytical report of the Intelligence Service of the Russian
      Federation), Moscow, 1996 and a material "To Whom Will Belong the
      Conscientious Weapon in the 21st Century", Moscow, 1997. (17).

      In 2000 V. Lopatin introduced, after two other authors, the third
      in order bill on the subject of  "Informational and Psychological
      Security of the Russian Federation. Lopotin's findings were
      reviewed by the Russian newspaper Segodnya:

      "Means of informational-psychological influence are capable not
      only of harming the health of an individual, but, also of causing,
      according to Lopatin, 'the blocking of freedom of will of human
      being on the subliminal level, the loss of the ability of
      political, cultural and social self identification, the
      manipulation of societal consciousness, which could lead to   the
      destruction of a sense of collective identify by the Russian people
      and nation' (16).

      In the book "Psychotronic Weapons and the Security of Russia", the
      authors propose among the basic principles of the Russian concept
      of defense against the remote control of the human psyche not only
      the acknowledgement of its existence, but also the fact that the
      methods of informational and psychotronic war are fully operational
      ("and are being used without a formal declaration of war") (18).
      They also quote the record from the session of the Russian
      Federation's Federal Council where V. Lopatin stated that
      psychotronic weapon can

      "cause the blocking of the freedom of will of a human being on a
      subliminal level" or "instillation into the consciousness or
      subconsciousness of a human being of information which will trigger
      a faulty or erroneous perception of reality" (19).

      In that regard, they proposed the preparation of national
      legislation as well as the establishment of legal international
      norms "aimed at the defense of human psyche against subliminal,
      destructive and informational manipulations" (20).

      Moreover, they also propose the declassification of all analytical
      studies and research on the various technologies. They warned that,
      because this research has remained classified and removed from the
      public eye, it has allowed the arms race to proceed unabated. It
      has thereby contributed to increasing the possibility of
      psychotronic war.

      Among the possible sources of remote influence on human psyche, the
      authors list the "generators of physical fields of "known as well
      as unknown nature" (21). In 1999 the STOA (Scientific and
      Technological Options Assessment), part of the Directorate General
      for Research of the European Parliament published the report on
      Crowd Control Technologies, ordered by them with the OMEGA
      foundation in Manchester (UK) (22,
      [6]http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pdf/99-14-01-a_en.pdf ).

      One of four major subjects of the study pertained  to the so-called
      "Second Generation or "non lethal" technologies:

       "This report evaluates the second generation of 'non-lethal'
      weapons which are emerging from national military and nuclear
      weapons laboratories in the United States as part of the Clinton
      Administration's 'non-lethal' warfare doctrine now adopted in turn
      by NATO. These devices include weapons using directed energy
      beam,radio frequency, laser and acoustic mechanisms to incapacitate
      human targets" (23) The report states that the most controversial
      non-lethal crowd control technology proposed by the U.S., are so
      called Radio Frequency or Directed Energy Weapons that can
      allegedly manipulate human behavior the greatest concern is with
      systems which can directly interact with the human nervous system
      (24). The report also states that perhaps the most powerful
      developments remain shrouded in secrecy (25).

       The unavailability of official documents confirming the existence
      of this technology may be the reason why the OMEGA report is
      referencing, with respect to mind control technology, the internet
      publication of the author of this article (26
      [7]http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pdf/99-14-01-a_en.pdf ).

       Similarly, the internet publication of the director of the
      American Human Rights and Anti-mind Control Organization (CAHRA),
      Cheryl Welsh, is referenced by the joint initiative of the Quaker
      United Nations Office, United Nations Institute for Disarmament
      Research, and Programme for Strategic and International Security
      Studies, with respect to non-lethal weapons (27).

      On September 25th, 2000, the Committee on Security of the Russian
      State Duma discussed the addendum to the article 6 of the Federal
      law On Weapons. In the resolution we read:

      "The achievements of contemporary science allow for creation of
      measured methods of secret, remote influencing on the psyches and
      physiology of a person or a group of people (28). The committee
      recommended that the addendum be approved. The addendum to the
      article 6 of the Russian Federation law "On Weapons was approved on
      July 26, 2001. It states:

      "within the territory of the Russian Federation is prohibited the
      circulation of weapons and other objects the effects of the
      operation of which are based on the use of electromagnetic, light,
      thermal, infra-sonic or ultra-sonic radiations (29).

      In this way, the Russian government made a first step to stand up
      to its dedication to the ban of mind control technology.

      In the Doctrine of Informational Security of the Russian
      Federation, signed by president Putin in September 2000, among the
      dangers threatening the informational security of Russian
      Federation, is listed

      "the threat to the constitutional rights and freedoms of people and
      citizens in the sphere of spiritual life individual, group and
      societal consciousness and "illegal use of special means affecting
      individual, group and societal consciousness" (30). Among the major
      directions of the international cooperation toward the guaranteeing
      of the informational security is listed the ban of production,
      dissemination and use of 'informational weapon (31).

      The foregoing statement should be interpreted as the continuing
      Russian commitment to the international ban of the means of remote
      influencing of the activity of the human brain.

      Similarly, in the above mentioned report, published by the STOA,
      the originally proposed version of the resolution of the European
      Parliament calls for:

      "an international convention for a global ban on all research and
      development which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical,
      electrical, sound vibration or other functioning of the human brain
      to the development of weapons which might enable the manipulation
      of human beings, including a ban of any actual or possible
      deployment of such systems.(32)

      Here the term "actual" might easily mean that such weapons are
      already deployed.

      Among the countries with the most advanced military technologies is
      the USA which did not present any international initiative
      demanding the ban of technologies enabling the remote control of
      human mind. (The original version of the bill by Denis J. Kucinich
      was changed.)

      All the same, according to the study published by STOA, the US is
      the major promoter of the use of those weapons. Non lethal
      technology was included into NATO military doctrine due to their
      effort:  "At the initiative of the USA, within the framework of
      NATO, a special group was formed, for the perspective use of
      devices of non-lethal effects" states the record from the session
      of the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma (28).

      The report published by STOA states: "In October 1999 NATO
      announced a new policy on non-lethal weapons and their place in
      allied arsenals" (33). "In 1996 non-lethal tools identified by the
      U.S. Army included directed energy systems" and "radio frequency
      weapons" (34) - those weapons, as was suggested in the STOA report
      as well, are being associated with the effects on the human nervous

      According to the Russian government informational agency FAPSI, in
      the last 15 years,U.S. expenditures on the development and
      acquisition of the means of informational war has increased
      fourfold, and at present they occupy the first place among all
      military programs (17),(3).

      Though there are possible uses of informational war, which do not
      imply mind control, the US Administration  has been unwilling to
      engage in negotiations on the ban on all forms of manipulation of
      the human brain. This unwillingness might indeed suggest that the
      US administration intends to use mind control technologies both
      within the US as well as internationally as an instrument of

      One clear consequence of the continuation of the apparent politics
      of secrecy surrounding technologies enabling remote control of the
      human brain is that the governments, who own such technologies,
      could use them without having to consult public opinion. Needless
      to say, any meaningful democracy in today's world could be
      disrupted, through secret and covert operations.  It is not
      inconceivable that in the future, entire population groups
      subjected to mind control technologies, could be living in a "fake
      democracy" where their own government or a foreign power could
      broadly shape their political opinions by means of mind control


      1) Handbook of Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, 1996,
      CRC Press Inc., 0-8493-0641-8/96, - pg. 117, 119, 474- 485,
      542-551, 565 at the top and third and last paragraph

      2) World Health Organization report on non-ionizing radiation from
      1991, pg. 143 and 207-208

      3) V. Lopatin, V Cygankov: Psichotronnoje oruie i bezopasnost
      Rossii, SINTEG, Russian Federation, Moscow, ISBN
      5-89638-006-2-A5-2000-30, list of the publications of the
      publishing house you will find at the address

      4) G. Gurtovoj, I. Vinokurov: Psychotronnaja vojna, ot mytov k
      realijam, Russsian Federation, Moscow, Mysteries, 1993, ISBN

      5) With greatest likelihood as well the Russian daily TRUD, which
      has organized the search for the documents, Moscow, between August
      1991 and end of 1992 6) John Evans: Mind, Body and
      Electromagnetism, the Burlington Press, Cambridge, 1992, ISBN
      1874498008, str.139

      7) Robert Becker: "Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the
      Foundation of Life", William Morrow and comp., New York, 1985, pg.

      8) Robert Becker: "Cross Currents, teh Startling Effects of
      Electromagnetic Radiation on your Health", 1991, Bloomsburry
      Publishing, London, Great Brittain, ISBN 0- 7475-0761-9, pg. 304,
      Robert Becker refers to Bioelectromagnetics Society Newsletter,
      January and February 1989

      9) Don R. Justesen, 1975, Microwaves and Behavior, American
      Psychologist, March 1975, pg. 391 - 401

      10) Dr. Nick Begich and Jeane Maning: "Angels Don't Play This
      HAARP, Advances in Tesla Technology", Earthpulse Press, 1995, ISBN
      0-9648812--0-9, pg. 169

      11) M. A. Persinger: On the Possibility of Directly Lacessing Every
      Human Brain by Electromagnetic Induction of Fundamental Algorythms,
      Perception and Motor Skills, June1995,, sv. 80, str. 791-799

      12) Nature, vol.391, 22.1.1998,str.316, Advances in Neurosciences
      May Threaten Human Rights

      13) Internet reference at the site of the United Nations University
      and Institute of Advanced Studies in Tokyo does not work any more,
      to verify the information it is necessary to find the document from
      the 1999 UN sponsored conference of neuroscientists in Tokyo, you
      may inquire at the address unuias at ias.unu.edu 14)
      [9]http://www.europarl.eu.int/home/default_en.htm?redirected=1 .
      click at Plenary sessions, scroll down to Reports by A4 number
      click, choose 1999 and fill in 005 to A4 or search for Resolution
      on the environment, security and foreign policy from January 28,

      15) [10]http://thomas.loc.gov./ and search for Space Preservation
      Act then click at H.R.2977

      16) Russian daily Segodnya, 11. February, 2000, Andrei Soldatov:
      Vsadniki psychotronitscheskovo apokalypsa" (Riders of Psychotronic

      17) See ref. 3), pg. 107

      18) See ref. 3) pg. 97

      19) See ref. 3), pg. 107

      20) See ref. 3), pg. 108

      21) See ref. 3) pg. 13

      22) [11]http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pdf/99-14-01-a_en.pdf

      23) see ref. 22 pg. XIX or 25

      24) see ref. 22 pg. LIII or 69

      25) see ref. 22 pg. XLVII or 63, aswell pg. VII-VIII or 7-8, pg.
      XIX or 25, pg. XLV or 61

      26) see ref. 22) pg. LIII or 69, note 354

      27) [12]http://www.unog.ch/unidir/Media%20Guide%20 CAHRA and Cheryl
      Welsh are listed at the page 24

      28) Document sent by Moscow Committee of Ecology of Dwellings.
      Telephone: Russian Federation, Zelenograd, 531-6411, Emilia
      Tschirkova, directrice

      29) Search [13]www.rambler.ru , there "poisk" (search) and search
      for "gosudarstvennaja duma" (State Duma) (it is necessary to type
      in Russian alphabet), at the page which appears choose
      "informacionnyj kanal gosudarstvennoj dumy" (Informational Channel
      of the Russian State Duma), there "federalnyje zakony podpisanyje
      prezidentom RF" (Federal laws signed by president of the Russian
      Federation), choose year 2001 and search 26 ijulja, è. N 103-F3
      (July 26, 2001, number N 103- F3) , "O vnesenii dopolnenija v
      statju 6 federalnogo zakona ob oruii" (addendum to the article 6 of
      the Federal law on weapons)

      30) Search [14]www.rambler.ru and then (type in Russian alphabet)
      "gosudarstvennaja duma", next "informacionnyj kanal gosudarstvennoj
      dumy" (informational channel of the State Duma), next search by use
      of "poisk" (search) Doktrina informacionnoj bezopasnosti Rossii"
      "Doctrine of the Informational Security of the Russian Federation)
      there see pg. 3 "Vidy informacionnych ugroz bezopasnosti
      Rossijskkoj federacii" (Types of Threats to the Informational
      Security of the Russian Federation)

      31) See ref. 30, pg. 19, "Mìdunarodnoje sotrudnièestvo Rossijskoj
      Federacii v oblasti obespeèenija informacionnoj bezopasnoti"
      (International Cooperation of the Russian Federation in Assuring
      the Informational Security"

      32) See ref.22, pg. XVII or 33

      33) See ref.22, pg. XLV or 61

      34) See ref.22 pg. XLVI or 62

      Mojmir Babacek is the founder of the International Movement for the
      Ban of the Manipulation of the Human Nervous System by Technical
      . He is the author of numerous articles on the issue of mind

    [16]Email this article to a friend

    [17]To become a Member of Global Research

    To express your opinion on this article, join the discussion at
    [18]Global Research's News and Discussion Forum , at

    The Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at
    [20]www.globalresearch.ca grants permission to cross-post original
    Global Research (Canada) articles in their entirety, or any portions
    thereof, on community internet sites, as long as the text & title of
    the article are not modified. The source must be acknowledged as
    follows: Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at
    [21]www.globalresearch.ca .  For cross-postings, kindly use the active
    URL hyperlink address of the original CRG article. The author's
    copyright note must be displayed. (For articles from other news
    sources, check with the original copyright holder, where applicable.).
    For publication of Global Research (Canada) articles in print or other
    forms including commercial internet sites, contact:
    [22]editor at globalresearch.ca .

    For media inquiries: [23]editor at globalresearch.ca


    4. http://globalresearch.ca/articles/BAB408B.html
    5. http://wrair-www.army.mil/
    6. http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pdf/99-14-01-a_en.pdf
    7. http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pdf/99-14-01-a_en.pdf
    8. http://www.sinteg.ru/cataloghead.htm
    9. http://www.europarl.eu.int/home/default_en.htm?redirected=1
   10. http://thomas.loc.gov/
   11. http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pdf/99-14-01-a_en.pdf
   12. http://www.unog.ch/unidir/Media%20Guide
   13. http://www.rambler.ru/
   14. http://www.rambler.ru/
   15. http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm
   16. mailto:?subject=%20article%20from%20Global%20Research?body=%20article%20at%20http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BAB408B.html
   17. http://www.globalresearch.ca/MEMBER.html
   18. http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/index.php
   19. http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/index.php
   20. http://www.globalresearch.ca/
   21. http://www.globalresearch.ca/
   22. mailto:editor at globalresearch.ca
   23. mailto:editor at globalresearch.ca

More information about the paleopsych mailing list