[Paleopsych] Global Research: The Remote Manipulation of the Human Brain
Premise Checker
checker at panix.com
Thu Aug 19 15:07:08 UTC 2004
The Remote Manipulation of the Human Brain
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/BAB408B.html
Centre for Research on Globalisation
Centre de recherche sur la mondialisation
4.8.6
The Deadly Instruments of the New World Order:
Electromagnetic and Informational Weapons:
Electromagnetic and Informational Weapons
by Mojmir Babacek
[Evaluate this for me, please.]
Editors Note:
We bring to our readers this carefully documented review article by
Mojmir Babajek.
While the text deals with a number of complex scientific processes,
the implications of these findings are far-reaching.
The arsenal of electromagnetic and informational weapons, used to
manipulate the human mind of targeted individuals or populations, is
an integral part of the weapons system of the New World Order.
The US military possesses a sophisticated arsenal of psychotronic
weapons which could be used both domestically and internationally.
Electromagnetic and informational Weapons could be used in
conventional wars theatres, without the knowledge of the enemy.
It is therefore essential that we not only take cognizance of these
findings, but we mobilize nationally and internationally against the
use of brain manipulating technologies.
Michel Chossudovsky, 5 August 2004
______________________________________________________________
In October 2000, Congressman Denis J. Kucinich introduced in the
House of Representatives a bill, which would oblige the American
president to engage in negotiations aimed at the ban of space based
weapons.
In this bill, the definition of a weapons system included:
"any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means inflicting
death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the
biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and
economic well-being of a person) through the use of land-based,
sea- based, or space-based systems using radiation,
electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies
directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the
purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of
such persons or populations(15).
As in all legislative acts quoted in this article, the bill
pertains to sound, light or electromagnetic stimulation of the
human brain.
Psychotronic weapons belong, at least for a layman uninformed of
secret military research, in the sphere of science fiction, since
so far none of the published scientific experiments has been
presented in a meaningful way to World public opinion.
That it is feasible to manipulate human behavior with the use of
subliminal, either by sound or visual messages, is now generally
known and acknowledged by the scientific community.
This is why in most countries, the use of such technologies,
without the consent of the individual concerned, is in theory
banned. Needless to say, the use of these technologies is
undertaken covertly, without the knowledge or consent of targeted
individuals.
Devices using light for the stimulation of the brain constitute
another mechanism whereby light flashing under certain frequencies
could be used to manipulate the human psychic.
As for the use of sound, a device transmitting a beam of sound
waves, which can be heard only by persons at whom the beam of sound
waves is targeted, has been reported in several news media. In
this case, the beam is formed by a combination of sound and
ultrasound waves which causes the targeted person to hear the sound
inside his head. Such a procedure could affect the mental balance
of the targeted individual as well as convince him that he is, so
to speak, mentally ill.
This article examines the development of technologies and knowledge
pertaining to the functioning of the human brain and the way new
methods of manipulation of the human mind are being developed.
Electromagnetic energy
One of the main methods of manipulation is through electromagnetic
energy.
In the declassified scientific literature only some 30 experiments
have been published supporting this assumption (1),(2). Already in
1974, in the USSR, after successful testing within a military unit
in Novosibirsk, the Radioson (Radiosleep) was registered with the
Government Committee on Matters of Inventions and Discoveries of
the USSR, described as a method of induction of sleep by means of
radio waves (3), (4), (5).
In the scientific literature, technical feasibility of inducing
sleep in a human being through the use of radio waves is confirmed
in a book by an British scientist involved in research on the
biological effects of electromagnetism (6). A report by the World
Health Organisation (WHO) on nonionizing radiation published in
1991 confirms that:
"many of biological effects observed in animals exposed to ELF
fields appear to be associated, either directly or indirectly, with
the nervous system" (2).
Among the published experiments, there are those where pulsed
microwaves have caused the synchronization of isolated neurons with
the frequency of pulsing of microwaves. Ffor example, a neuron
firing at a frequency of 0.8 Hz was forced in this way to fire the
impulses at a frequency of 1 Hz. Moreover, the pulsed microwaves
contributed to changing the concentration of neurotransmitters in
the brain (neurotransmitters are a part of the mechanism which
causes the firing of neurons in the brain) and reinforcing or
attenuating the effects of drugs delivered into the brain (1).
The experiment where the main brain frequencies registered by EEG
were synchronized with the frequency of microwave pulsing (1,2)
might explain the function of the Russian installation Radioson.
Microwaves pulsed in the sleep frequency would cause the
synchronization of the brain's activity with the sleep frequency
and in this way produce sleep.
Pulsing of microwaves in frequency predominating in the brain at an
awakened state could, by the same procedure, deny sleep to a human
being.
A report derived from the testing program of the Microwave Research
Department at the [5]Walter Reed Army Institute of Research states
"Microwave pulses appear to couple to the central nervous system
and produce stimulation similar to electric stimulation unrelated
to heat".
In a many times replicated experiment, microwaves pulsed in an
exact frequency caused the efflux of calcium ions from the nerve
cells (1,2). Calcium plays a key role in the firing of neurons and
Ross Adey, member of the first scientific team which published this
experiment, publicly expressed his conviction that this effect of
electromagnetic radiation would interfere with concentration on
complex tasks (7).
Robert Becker, who had share in the discovery of the effect of
pulsed fields at the healing of broken bones, published the
excerpts from the report from Walter Reed Army Institute testing
program. In the first part "prompt debilitation effects" should
have been tested (8). Were not those effects based on the
experiment by Ross Adey and others with calcium efflux?
British scientist John Evans, working in the same field, wrote that
both Ross Adey and Robert Becker lost their positions and research
grants and called them "free-thinking exiles" (6). In 1975, in the
USA, a military experiment was published where pulsed microwaves
produced, in the brain of a human subject, an audio perception of
numbers from 1 to 10 (9). Again the possibility to convince an
individual that it is mentally ill is obvious. The testing program
of American Walter Read Army Institute of Research, where the
experiment took place, counts with "prompt auditory stimulation by
means of auditory effects" and finally aims at "behavior controlled
by stimulation" (8).
Let us assume that the words delivered into the brain were
transcribed into ultrasound frequencies. Would not then the subject
perceive those same words as his own thoughts?
And would this not imply that that his behavior was being
controlled in this way through the transmission of ultrasound
frequencies? In this regard, the American Air Force 1982 "Final
Report On Biotechnology Research Requirements For Aeronautical
Systems Through the Year 2000" states:
"While initial attention should be toward degradation of human
performance through thermal loading and electromagnetic field
effects, subsequent work should address the possibilities of
directing and interrogating mental functioning, using externally
applied fields" (10).
Several scientists have warned that the latest advances in
neurophysiology could be used for the manipulation of the human
brain.
In June 1995, Michael Persinger, who worked on the American Navy's
project of Non-lethal electromagnetic weapons, published a
scientific article where he states:
"the technical capability to influence directly the major portion
of the approximately six billion brains of the human species
without mediation through classical sensory modalities by
generating neural information within a physical medium within which
all members of the species are immersed is now marginally feasible
(11).
In 1998, the French National Bioethics Committee warned that
"neuroscience is being increasingly recognized as posing a
potential threat to human rights (12). In May 1999 the
neuroscientists conference, sponsored by the UN, took place in
Tokyo. Its final declaration formally acknowledges that :
"Today we have intellectual, physical and financial resources to
master the power of the brain itself, and to develop devices to
touch the mind and even control or erase consciousnessWe wish to
profess our hope that such pursuit of knowledge serves peace and
welfare" (13).
On the international political scene, in the last few years, the
concept of remote control of the human brain has become a matter
of international and intergovernmental negotiation. In January
1999, the European Parliament passed a resolution where it called
"for an international convention introducing a global ban on all
developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form
of manipulation of human beings. (14)
Already in 1997, nine states of the Commonwealth of Independent
States (CIS) addressed the UN, OBSE and the states of the
Interparliamentary Union with the proposal to place at the agenda
of the General Assembly of the United Nations, the preparation and
adoption of an international convention "On Prevention of
Informational Wars and Limitation of Circulation of Informational
Weapons" (16), (3).
Informational Weapons
The initiative was originally proposed, in the Russian State Duma,
by Vladimir Lopatin (3). V. Lopatin worked, from 1990 to 1995, in
sequence, in the standing committees on Security respectively of
the Russian Federation, Russian State Duma and of the
Interparliamentary Assembly of the Commonwealth of Independent
States (CIS), specializing in informational security.(3). The
concept of informational weapon or informational war is rather
unknown to the world general public. In 1999, V. Lopatin, together
with Russian scientist Vladimir Tsygankov, published a book
Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia (3). There we find
the explanation of this terminology:
"In the report on the research of the American Physical Society
for the year 1993 the conclusion is presented that psychophysical
weapon systemscan be used for the construction of a strategic arm
of a new type (informational weapon in informational war)"
Among many references on this subject, we refer to Materials of the
Parliament Hearings "Threats and Challenges in the Sphere of
Informational Security", Moscow, July 1996, "Informational Weapon
as a Threat to the National Security of the Russian Federation"
(analytical report of the Intelligence Service of the Russian
Federation), Moscow, 1996 and a material "To Whom Will Belong the
Conscientious Weapon in the 21st Century", Moscow, 1997. (17).
In 2000 V. Lopatin introduced, after two other authors, the third
in order bill on the subject of "Informational and Psychological
Security of the Russian Federation. Lopotin's findings were
reviewed by the Russian newspaper Segodnya:
"Means of informational-psychological influence are capable not
only of harming the health of an individual, but, also of causing,
according to Lopatin, 'the blocking of freedom of will of human
being on the subliminal level, the loss of the ability of
political, cultural and social self identification, the
manipulation of societal consciousness, which could lead to the
destruction of a sense of collective identify by the Russian people
and nation' (16).
In the book "Psychotronic Weapons and the Security of Russia", the
authors propose among the basic principles of the Russian concept
of defense against the remote control of the human psyche not only
the acknowledgement of its existence, but also the fact that the
methods of informational and psychotronic war are fully operational
("and are being used without a formal declaration of war") (18).
They also quote the record from the session of the Russian
Federation's Federal Council where V. Lopatin stated that
psychotronic weapon can
"cause the blocking of the freedom of will of a human being on a
subliminal level" or "instillation into the consciousness or
subconsciousness of a human being of information which will trigger
a faulty or erroneous perception of reality" (19).
In that regard, they proposed the preparation of national
legislation as well as the establishment of legal international
norms "aimed at the defense of human psyche against subliminal,
destructive and informational manipulations" (20).
Moreover, they also propose the declassification of all analytical
studies and research on the various technologies. They warned that,
because this research has remained classified and removed from the
public eye, it has allowed the arms race to proceed unabated. It
has thereby contributed to increasing the possibility of
psychotronic war.
Among the possible sources of remote influence on human psyche, the
authors list the "generators of physical fields of "known as well
as unknown nature" (21). In 1999 the STOA (Scientific and
Technological Options Assessment), part of the Directorate General
for Research of the European Parliament published the report on
Crowd Control Technologies, ordered by them with the OMEGA
foundation in Manchester (UK) (22,
[6]http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pdf/99-14-01-a_en.pdf ).
One of four major subjects of the study pertained to the so-called
"Second Generation or "non lethal" technologies:
"This report evaluates the second generation of 'non-lethal'
weapons which are emerging from national military and nuclear
weapons laboratories in the United States as part of the Clinton
Administration's 'non-lethal' warfare doctrine now adopted in turn
by NATO. These devices include weapons using directed energy
beam,radio frequency, laser and acoustic mechanisms to incapacitate
human targets" (23) The report states that the most controversial
non-lethal crowd control technology proposed by the U.S., are so
called Radio Frequency or Directed Energy Weapons that can
allegedly manipulate human behavior the greatest concern is with
systems which can directly interact with the human nervous system
(24). The report also states that perhaps the most powerful
developments remain shrouded in secrecy (25).
The unavailability of official documents confirming the existence
of this technology may be the reason why the OMEGA report is
referencing, with respect to mind control technology, the internet
publication of the author of this article (26
[7]http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pdf/99-14-01-a_en.pdf ).
Similarly, the internet publication of the director of the
American Human Rights and Anti-mind Control Organization (CAHRA),
Cheryl Welsh, is referenced by the joint initiative of the Quaker
United Nations Office, United Nations Institute for Disarmament
Research, and Programme for Strategic and International Security
Studies, with respect to non-lethal weapons (27).
On September 25th, 2000, the Committee on Security of the Russian
State Duma discussed the addendum to the article 6 of the Federal
law On Weapons. In the resolution we read:
"The achievements of contemporary science allow for creation of
measured methods of secret, remote influencing on the psyches and
physiology of a person or a group of people (28). The committee
recommended that the addendum be approved. The addendum to the
article 6 of the Russian Federation law "On Weapons was approved on
July 26, 2001. It states:
"within the territory of the Russian Federation is prohibited the
circulation of weapons and other objects the effects of the
operation of which are based on the use of electromagnetic, light,
thermal, infra-sonic or ultra-sonic radiations (29).
In this way, the Russian government made a first step to stand up
to its dedication to the ban of mind control technology.
In the Doctrine of Informational Security of the Russian
Federation, signed by president Putin in September 2000, among the
dangers threatening the informational security of Russian
Federation, is listed
"the threat to the constitutional rights and freedoms of people and
citizens in the sphere of spiritual life individual, group and
societal consciousness and "illegal use of special means affecting
individual, group and societal consciousness" (30). Among the major
directions of the international cooperation toward the guaranteeing
of the informational security is listed the ban of production,
dissemination and use of 'informational weapon (31).
The foregoing statement should be interpreted as the continuing
Russian commitment to the international ban of the means of remote
influencing of the activity of the human brain.
Similarly, in the above mentioned report, published by the STOA,
the originally proposed version of the resolution of the European
Parliament calls for:
"an international convention for a global ban on all research and
development which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical,
electrical, sound vibration or other functioning of the human brain
to the development of weapons which might enable the manipulation
of human beings, including a ban of any actual or possible
deployment of such systems.(32)
Here the term "actual" might easily mean that such weapons are
already deployed.
Among the countries with the most advanced military technologies is
the USA which did not present any international initiative
demanding the ban of technologies enabling the remote control of
human mind. (The original version of the bill by Denis J. Kucinich
was changed.)
All the same, according to the study published by STOA, the US is
the major promoter of the use of those weapons. Non lethal
technology was included into NATO military doctrine due to their
effort: "At the initiative of the USA, within the framework of
NATO, a special group was formed, for the perspective use of
devices of non-lethal effects" states the record from the session
of the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma (28).
The report published by STOA states: "In October 1999 NATO
announced a new policy on non-lethal weapons and their place in
allied arsenals" (33). "In 1996 non-lethal tools identified by the
U.S. Army included directed energy systems" and "radio frequency
weapons" (34) - those weapons, as was suggested in the STOA report
as well, are being associated with the effects on the human nervous
system.
According to the Russian government informational agency FAPSI, in
the last 15 years,U.S. expenditures on the development and
acquisition of the means of informational war has increased
fourfold, and at present they occupy the first place among all
military programs (17),(3).
Though there are possible uses of informational war, which do not
imply mind control, the US Administration has been unwilling to
engage in negotiations on the ban on all forms of manipulation of
the human brain. This unwillingness might indeed suggest that the
US administration intends to use mind control technologies both
within the US as well as internationally as an instrument of
warfare.
One clear consequence of the continuation of the apparent politics
of secrecy surrounding technologies enabling remote control of the
human brain is that the governments, who own such technologies,
could use them without having to consult public opinion. Needless
to say, any meaningful democracy in today's world could be
disrupted, through secret and covert operations. It is not
inconceivable that in the future, entire population groups
subjected to mind control technologies, could be living in a "fake
democracy" where their own government or a foreign power could
broadly shape their political opinions by means of mind control
technologies.
______________________________________________________________
REFERENCES
1) Handbook of Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, 1996,
CRC Press Inc., 0-8493-0641-8/96, - pg. 117, 119, 474- 485,
542-551, 565 at the top and third and last paragraph
2) World Health Organization report on non-ionizing radiation from
1991, pg. 143 and 207-208
3) V. Lopatin, V Cygankov: Psichotronnoje oruie i bezopasnost
Rossii, SINTEG, Russian Federation, Moscow, ISBN
5-89638-006-2-A5-2000-30, list of the publications of the
publishing house you will find at the address
[8]http://www.sinteg.ru/cataloghead.htm
4) G. Gurtovoj, I. Vinokurov: Psychotronnaja vojna, ot mytov k
realijam, Russsian Federation, Moscow, Mysteries, 1993, ISBN
5-86422-098-1
5) With greatest likelihood as well the Russian daily TRUD, which
has organized the search for the documents, Moscow, between August
1991 and end of 1992 6) John Evans: Mind, Body and
Electromagnetism, the Burlington Press, Cambridge, 1992, ISBN
1874498008, str.139
7) Robert Becker: "Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the
Foundation of Life", William Morrow and comp., New York, 1985, pg.
287
8) Robert Becker: "Cross Currents, teh Startling Effects of
Electromagnetic Radiation on your Health", 1991, Bloomsburry
Publishing, London, Great Brittain, ISBN 0- 7475-0761-9, pg. 304,
Robert Becker refers to Bioelectromagnetics Society Newsletter,
January and February 1989
9) Don R. Justesen, 1975, Microwaves and Behavior, American
Psychologist, March 1975, pg. 391 - 401
10) Dr. Nick Begich and Jeane Maning: "Angels Don't Play This
HAARP, Advances in Tesla Technology", Earthpulse Press, 1995, ISBN
0-9648812--0-9, pg. 169
11) M. A. Persinger: On the Possibility of Directly Lacessing Every
Human Brain by Electromagnetic Induction of Fundamental Algorythms,
Perception and Motor Skills, June1995,, sv. 80, str. 791-799
12) Nature, vol.391, 22.1.1998,str.316, Advances in Neurosciences
May Threaten Human Rights
13) Internet reference at the site of the United Nations University
and Institute of Advanced Studies in Tokyo does not work any more,
to verify the information it is necessary to find the document from
the 1999 UN sponsored conference of neuroscientists in Tokyo, you
may inquire at the address unuias at ias.unu.edu 14)
[9]http://www.europarl.eu.int/home/default_en.htm?redirected=1 .
click at Plenary sessions, scroll down to Reports by A4 number
click, choose 1999 and fill in 005 to A4 or search for Resolution
on the environment, security and foreign policy from January 28,
1999
15) [10]http://thomas.loc.gov./ and search for Space Preservation
Act then click at H.R.2977
16) Russian daily Segodnya, 11. February, 2000, Andrei Soldatov:
Vsadniki psychotronitscheskovo apokalypsa" (Riders of Psychotronic
Apokalypse)
17) See ref. 3), pg. 107
18) See ref. 3) pg. 97
19) See ref. 3), pg. 107
20) See ref. 3), pg. 108
21) See ref. 3) pg. 13
22) [11]http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pdf/99-14-01-a_en.pdf
23) see ref. 22 pg. XIX or 25
24) see ref. 22 pg. LIII or 69
25) see ref. 22 pg. XLVII or 63, aswell pg. VII-VIII or 7-8, pg.
XIX or 25, pg. XLV or 61
26) see ref. 22) pg. LIII or 69, note 354
27) [12]http://www.unog.ch/unidir/Media%20Guide%20 CAHRA and Cheryl
Welsh are listed at the page 24
28) Document sent by Moscow Committee of Ecology of Dwellings.
Telephone: Russian Federation, Zelenograd, 531-6411, Emilia
Tschirkova, directrice
29) Search [13]www.rambler.ru , there "poisk" (search) and search
for "gosudarstvennaja duma" (State Duma) (it is necessary to type
in Russian alphabet), at the page which appears choose
"informacionnyj kanal gosudarstvennoj dumy" (Informational Channel
of the Russian State Duma), there "federalnyje zakony podpisanyje
prezidentom RF" (Federal laws signed by president of the Russian
Federation), choose year 2001 and search 26 ijulja, è. N 103-F3
(July 26, 2001, number N 103- F3) , "O vnesenii dopolnenija v
statju 6 federalnogo zakona ob oruii" (addendum to the article 6 of
the Federal law on weapons)
30) Search [14]www.rambler.ru and then (type in Russian alphabet)
"gosudarstvennaja duma", next "informacionnyj kanal gosudarstvennoj
dumy" (informational channel of the State Duma), next search by use
of "poisk" (search) Doktrina informacionnoj bezopasnosti Rossii"
"Doctrine of the Informational Security of the Russian Federation)
there see pg. 3 "Vidy informacionnych ugroz bezopasnosti
Rossijskkoj federacii" (Types of Threats to the Informational
Security of the Russian Federation)
31) See ref. 30, pg. 19, "Mìdunarodnoje sotrudnièestvo Rossijskoj
Federacii v oblasti obespeèenija informacionnoj bezopasnoti"
(International Cooperation of the Russian Federation in Assuring
the Informational Security"
32) See ref.22, pg. XVII or 33
33) See ref.22, pg. XLV or 61
34) See ref.22 pg. XLVI or 62
Mojmir Babacek is the founder of the International Movement for the
Ban of the Manipulation of the Human Nervous System by Technical
Means,
[15]http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm
. He is the author of numerous articles on the issue of mind
manipulation.
______________________________________________________________
[16]Email this article to a friend
[17]To become a Member of Global Research
To express your opinion on this article, join the discussion at
[18]Global Research's News and Discussion Forum , at
[19]http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/index.php
The Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at
[20]www.globalresearch.ca grants permission to cross-post original
Global Research (Canada) articles in their entirety, or any portions
thereof, on community internet sites, as long as the text & title of
the article are not modified. The source must be acknowledged as
follows: Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at
[21]www.globalresearch.ca . For cross-postings, kindly use the active
URL hyperlink address of the original CRG article. The author's
copyright note must be displayed. (For articles from other news
sources, check with the original copyright holder, where applicable.).
For publication of Global Research (Canada) articles in print or other
forms including commercial internet sites, contact:
[22]editor at globalresearch.ca .
For media inquiries: [23]editor at globalresearch.ca
References
4. http://globalresearch.ca/articles/BAB408B.html
5. http://wrair-www.army.mil/
6. http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pdf/99-14-01-a_en.pdf
7. http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pdf/99-14-01-a_en.pdf
8. http://www.sinteg.ru/cataloghead.htm
9. http://www.europarl.eu.int/home/default_en.htm?redirected=1
10. http://thomas.loc.gov/
11. http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pdf/99-14-01-a_en.pdf
12. http://www.unog.ch/unidir/Media%20Guide
13. http://www.rambler.ru/
14. http://www.rambler.ru/
15. http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm
16. mailto:?subject=%20article%20from%20Global%20Research?body=%20article%20at%20http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BAB408B.html
17. http://www.globalresearch.ca/MEMBER.html
18. http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/index.php
19. http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/index.php
20. http://www.globalresearch.ca/
21. http://www.globalresearch.ca/
22. mailto:editor at globalresearch.ca
23. mailto:editor at globalresearch.ca
More information about the paleopsych
mailing list