[Paleopsych] Presidential Lectures: Jacques Derrida: Introduction
Premise Checker
checker at panix.com
Mon Oct 18 17:26:50 UTC 2004
Presidential Lectures: Jacques Derrida: Introduction
http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/derrida/
Algerian-born French philosopher Jacques Derrida has had an enormous
impact on intellectual life around the world. So much so that his work
has been the subject, in whole or in part, of more than 400 books. In
the areas of philosophy and literary criticism alone, Derrida has been
cited more than 14,000 times in journal articles over the past 17
years [14]^1. He was recently featured in a [15]story in The New York
Times. More than 500 US, British and Canadian dissertations treat him
and his writings as primary subjects. He came into prominence in
America with his critical approach or methodology or philosophy of
[16]deconstruction, and it is this line of thought that continues to
identify him.
Derrida's deconstructionist works are integrally related to the more
general phenomenon of [17]postmodernism. Postmodernist theories and
attitudes come in a variety of forms. In the realm of social and
political theory, what unites them -- from Foucault to Baudrillard,
from Lyotard to Derrida and others -- is a challenge to, and largely a
rejection of, both the truth value and pragmatic capacity for
achieving justice or peace of the modern system of political and
economic institutions, as well as the very ways in which we know and
act to explain and understand ourselves. Especially in the latter
theoretical and explanatory domain, Derrida's deconstructionism is
provocative, if not subversive, in questioning the self-evidence,
logic and non-judgmental character of dichotomies we live by, such as
legitimate/illegitimate, rational/irrational, fact/fiction, or
observation/imagination.
During the 1960s Derrida published several influential pieces in Tel
Quel, France's forum of leftist avant-garde theory. Among this group
were not only those mentioned above in relation to postmodernism, but
also Bataille, Barthes, Kristeva, and several others. He later
distanced himself from Tel Quel.
He taught philosophy at the Sorbonne from 1960-1964 and the École
Normale Superieure from 1964-1984. He currently directs the École des
Hautes Études en Science Sociales in Paris. Since 1986 he has also
been Professor of Philosophy, French and Comparative Literature at the
University of California, Irvine and continues to lecture in academic
institutions on both sides of the Atlantic.
Derrida is "perhaps the world's most famous philosopher -- if not the
only famous philosopher," in the words of Dinitia Smith, the talented
and entertaining author of the aforementioned New York Times feature
"Philosopher Gamely in Defense of His Ideas." Ms. Smith confided in
the article, "A scholar ... warned against asking him [Derrida] to
define 'deconstruction,' the notoriously difficult and widely
influential method of inquiry he invented more than three decades ago.
'Make it your last question,' the scholar counseled, because it sends
deconstructionists into "paroxysms of rage.'"
If Derrida and deconstruction can not be discussed one without the
other, what then is [18]deconstruction? Definitions even vary, from a
[19]seven page-explanation to a [20]four page entry or an [21]eleven
page reference. How does Professor Derrida himself define it? He says
of course a very great deal in numerous writings as well as in
published interviews such as Deconstruction in a nutshell: a
conversation with Jacques Derrida. What Ms. Smith reported of their
conversation at the Polo Grill is the following:
"It is impossible to respond," Mr. Derrida said. "I can only do
something which will leave me unsatisfied." But after some
prodding, he gave it a try anyway. "I often describe deconstruction
as something which happens. It's not purely linguistic, involving
text or books. You can deconstruct gestures, choreography. That's
why I enlarged the concept of text."
Mr. Derrida did not seem angry at having to define his philosophy
at all; he was even smiling. "Everything is a text; this is a
text," he said, waving his arm at the diners around him in the
bland suburbanlike restaurant, blithely picking at their lunches,
completely unaware that they were being "deconstructed."
The name Derrida brings up controversies that would normally be
reserved for political figures. In 1992 at the ever proper Cambridge
University, the granting of an honorary degree to Derrida provoked an
[22]impassioned debate among the dons. The end result was the unusual
step of putting the issue to vote, the first rift of its kind in
twenty-nine years. It was settled by a 336-204 vote in Derrida's favor
(a veritable landslide victory in the context of normal politics).
And in such an atmosphere of keen debate and disagreements, parody is
not unknown. Stanford English Professor John L'Heureux, with
deconstruction and its critical-theoretical progeny in view, offered
the reader this prospect of a brave new academic world in his novel
The Handmaid of Desire:
This department [The Department of Theory and Discourse] was his
dream; it would revolutionize university studies. It would include
Comp Lit, Mod Thought, and all the little language departments --
French, Russian, Spanish, you name it. It would take on all written
documents, equally with absolute indifference to the author's
reputation or the western canon or the nature of writing itself --
whether it was Flaubert's Bovary or a 1950 tax form or a label on a
Campbell's soup can . . .-- and subject them all to the probing,
thrusting, hard-breathing analysis of the latest developments in
metaphilosophical trans-literary theory. Whatever those theories
might be. Wherever they might lead.
However one values Derrida's writings and the philosophical positions
and intellectual traditions from which he proceeds, it would be
wrongheaded to think of him as an occupant of some "ivory tower".
Derrida is the proverbial activist-theorist, who, over the years, has
fought for a number of political causes, including the rights of
Algerian immigrants in France, anti-apartheid, and the rights of Czech
Charter 77 dissidents. True to his own construction of the world and
his own autobiography, he has admitted few, if any, strict dichotomies
in his life. As he put it in another context, "I am applied Derrida."
By John Rawlings
Jacques Derrida pages edited by Stanford University curators: John
Rawlings (Humanities and Social Science Bibliographer,
[23]rawlings at sulmail.stanford.edu), Tony Angiletta (Morrison Curator
for the Social Sciences and Population Studies
[24]tangilet at sulmail.stanford.edu), and Mary Jane Parrine (Curator for
Romance Languages Collections, [25]parrine at leland.stanford.edu)
[4]Jacques Derrida
[5]BIBLIOGRAPHY
[6]EXCERPTS [7]DECONSTRUCTION
[8]INTERVIEWS
[9]LINKS [10]SCHEDULE
[11]SYMPOSIA
[12]HUMANITIES AT STANFORD
References
4. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/derrida/index.html
5. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/derrida/biblio.html
6. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/derrida/excerpts.html
7. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/derrida/deconstruction.html
8. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/derrida/interviews.html
9. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/derrida/links.html
10. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/derrida/jdsched.html
11. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/symposia/index.html
12. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/humanities/index.html
13. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/derrida/gifs/derrida.jpg
14. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/derrida/#footnote1
15. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/derrida/nytderrida.html
16. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/derrida/deconstruction.html
17. http://www.colorado.edu/English/ENGL2012Klages/pomo.html
18. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/derrida/deconstruction.html
19. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/derrida/deconstruction.html#1
20. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/derrida/deconstruction.html#2
21. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/derrida/deconstruction.html#3
22. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/derrida/interviews.html#cambridge
23. mailto:rawlings at sulmail.stanford.edu
24. mailto:tangilet at sulmail.stanford.edu
25. mailto:parrine at leland.stanford.edu
26. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/discussion/index.html
27. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/calendar/index.html
28. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/index.html
29. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/symposia/index.html
30. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/humanities/index.html
31. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/derrida/#top
32. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/home.html
33. http://www-sul.stanford.edu/
34. http://www.stanford.edu/
More information about the paleopsych
mailing list