[Paleopsych] TLS: John Gray: Rising against all reason
Premise Checker
checker at panix.com
Sun Jun 12 19:01:38 UTC 2005
John Gray: Rising against all reason
The Times Literary Supplement, 1.2.9
http://the-tls.co.uk/archive/story.aspx?story_id=2104632&window_type=print
THE VOICE OF MODERN HATRED. Encounters with Europe's New Right. By
Nicholas Fraser. 327pp. Picador. £16.99. TLS £14.99 - 0 330 37212 2.
The revival of the far Right in Europe during the past ten years has
come as something of a shock to liberal opinion, but two generations
ago it was widely feared. A revival of fascism was expected from the
beginning by the Allied occupying forces in Germany. In 1947, they
commissioned polls in the American Zone, which confirmed their worst
fears. The polls revealed that between 47 and 55 per cent of Germans
believed that National Socialism, contrary to all evidence, was - as
Nicholas Fraser drily puts it in The Voice of Modern Hatred:
Encounters with Europe's New Right - "a good idea badly carried out".
Partly as a response to such evidence, the authorities of the new
Germany passed the Basic Law of 1950, which made it constitutionally
possible to ban extremist political parties. Despite these efforts,
and the decades of education in democracy that followed them, Germany
has not escaped the recrudescence of the radical Right that is under
way in many European countries. What frightens and confounds liberals
today is that - in Austria, Belgium, Switzerland, France, Denmark and
the eastern parts of Germany, for example - far Right movements are
gaining influence, and sometimes power, after half a century of stable
democratic government, and at a time of unprecedented general
prosperity. According to all the models of political development that
were developed in post-war democratic theory, this is a
near-impossibility.Yet it is happening today in many parts of Europe.
Liberal bafflement at this seemingly inexplicable reversion to type in
Continental Europe is the animating theme of Nicholas Fraser's
arresting and at times wrenchingly honest book, which was written in
tandem with a series of television programmes recording Fraser's
travels across Europe. Partly for that reason, it is a highly personal
narrative, presented almost in the style of a novel. This might seem
an unpromising and overambitious format for an inquiry into the
European radical Right, but in fact Fraser succeeds brilliantly in
interweaving his thoughts on the seeming anomaly of the reappearance
of the politics of hatred throughout much of Europe with a succession
of repulsive and fascinating vignettes of some of the leading
representatives of Europe's New Right. Political leaders such as
Jean-Marie Le Pen, Vlaams Blok and Jorg Haider, "revisionist
historians" such as Robert Faurisson and David Irving - these and
other figures are swept up in a penetrating, digressive monologue in
which moods of perplexed sympathy alternate with bouts of fury and
despair.
Though The Voice of Modern Hatred contains more information and
clear-headed thought than many academic texts, it does not pretend to
offer anything like a theory of the movements with which it deals.
Fraser is too alert to the singularity of the people and circumstances
of which he writes to seek to encapsulate them in any neat
formulation. Yet the book does suggest an overall interpretation of
the European New Right. The overwhelming impression left by Fraser's
vignettes is that the attitudes of today's far-rightists are not very
different from those of the 1930s. The characters whom Fraser
describes are a pretty miscellaneous bunch. They have very varying
degrees of influence, ranging from nearly complete political
marginality to being serious contenders for key positions in national
government. Some are undeniably plebeian, others highly educated, some
aspire to be demagogues, while others pose as martyrs.
They come from a wide variety of national and regional milieux. But it
is striking that denial of the Holocaust is an integral part of the
world-view of practically every one of them. Today, as in the 1930s,
anti-Semitism is the dark, unbroken thread that runs all the way
through the European far Right.
This is not the only echo of the inter-war years. The intellectuals
described are in many ways strikingly reminiscent of Europe's
proto-Nazi bohemian intelligentsia. Only a few anachronistic details
divide Fraser's disoriented would-be Brownshirts, reading Celine,
Genet and Foucault during brief periods of imprisonment, from their
confreres seventy years ago. Then the alienated intellectual's
preferred reading was Ernst Junger or Moeller van den Bruck; but the
content was the same. The fact is that hostility to liberal society is
not an intermittent aberration of the European intelligentsia. On the
Left as well as the Right, among believers in Enlightenment as much as
the thinkers of the Counter-Enlightenment, political movements that
not only criticize, but actually aim to destroy liberal institutions
have always had a powerful appeal.
In the nineteenth century, it was thinkers such as the authoritarian
Auguste Comte, not John Stuart Mill, who commanded a mass intellectual
following. In the twentieth century there were normally a dozen
Marinettis and Drieu la Rochelles for every Isaiah Berlin or Karl
Popper. Nor was the infatuation with anti-liberal regimes limited to
Continental thinkers. It was just as strong in G. B. Shaw, H. G.
Wells, T. S. Eliot, G. K. Chesterton and a good many other English
writers. The idea that Europe's intellectuals are somehow
constitutionally liberal is a mirage generated by the Second World
War.
To be sure, despite the alarming inroads that are being made by the
New Right, we are far from the endemic crises of the inter-war years.
Liberal institutions are under threat, but - except maybe in Russia
and parts of the Balkans - there is no likelihood of their being
overthrown. Instead, Europe seems to be returning to something
approaching its condition towards the end of the nineteenth century,
when, in many countries, the politics of hate enjoyed the support of
large sections of the public, and intellectuals wavered between
support for liberal values and the perennial charms of extremism.
More information about the paleopsych
mailing list