[extropy-chat] Re: John Wright Finds God

Samantha Atkins sjatkins at gmail.com
Mon Dec 13 23:29:10 UTC 2004


In "I am the way" much depends on the sense of what is translated as
"I".   It could be the personal dude form of "I".  On the other hand
it could refer to a type of consciousness some call the "Christ
consciousness".    The latter is a lot more universal as an
interpretation and a lot more inclusive.

- samantha


On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 01:33:28 +0000, Dirk Bruere <dirk at neopax.com> wrote:
> Mike Lorrey wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> >--- Dirk Bruere <dirk at neopax.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Again, you seem to be lacking a great deal of theological knowledge.
> >>Just to give one example, is Jesus still Jesus if his name was really
> >>Yashua? And can we call upon Jesus even if we do not know his name
> >>(any of them) at all? Can we call upon him even if we do not know he
> >>existed/exists? In fact, *what* is Jesus?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Jesus is a domain name. The real trick is finding out his/her/its IP
> >address... ;)
> >
> >The IP of the true server of the Jesus domain could very easily be
> >serving other domain names, for different websites, each with their own
> >content and structure. They might be the same site, but presenting
> >different structure and language based on the web browser and
> >language/culture of the browsing individual.
> >
> >Penetrating this graphical interface, and getting to the command
> >prompt, not to mention root level access, is the same quest as Neo
> >seeking to find out what is the Matrix.
> >
> >
> >
> That's not really the answer to the question.
> It refers to the statement 'I am the Way' - not *a* Way.
> If we accept Xian theology then JC is the name given to the link between
> man and god. There's only one link, but there are any number of methods
> to access it. Accessing it does not mean having to know the detailed
> history of JC as any kind of historical person. One only has to know
> that it exists and be willing to use it.
> 
> It comes down to this: What is the absolute minimum one has to
> know/believe in order to be an Xian?
> Clearly the name is irrelevent (since we don't actually use his likely
> historical name).
> A full bio is also not required, since we don't have one.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Dirk
> 
> The Consensus:-
> The political party for the new millenium
> http://www.theconsensus.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo/extropy-chat
>



More information about the extropy-chat mailing list