[extropy-chat] Coin Flip Paradox
gts_2000 at yahoo.com
Tue Jan 30 01:11:38 UTC 2007
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:34:11 -0500, Mike Dougherty <msd001 at gmail.com>
> I have come to appreciate "gts" as a tag representing an almost religious
> dogma on a subject I don't seem to care enough about to fully understand.
Thanks, but I have been objecting here when I see others taking one or
another philosophical theory as dogma, so I think it's funny that my
arguments are seen by you as dogma. I have tried very hard not to tie my
beliefs to one or another philosophical interpretation, hoping to find
some more general interpretation.
Currently there exist huge gaps between and amongst the five different
philosophical theories that purport to explain the foundations of
Kolmogorov's formal probability axioms. They are 1) the classical, 2) the
logical, 3) the subjective, 4) the frequentist, and 5) the propensity
theories. Each of these theories has drawbacks, and each also something to
offer. None of them seems to capture the full meaning of probability
So a LOT of academic work still needs to be done in the philosophical
foundations of probability theory! And this subject is made all the more
important by the philosophical problems posed by QM.
I'd like to see my intelligent friends here on extropy-chat address the
problem. I'm not encouraged when I see them sitting in the peanut gallery
throwing spit-wads at the questions... sigh...
But I do appreciate the spirit of your comment. :)
More information about the extropy-chat