[ExI] extropy-chat Digest, Vol 192, Issue 11

[Rafal Smigrodzki]

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 11:36 PM Stuart LaForge via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:

>
> Quoting Bill Wallace:
>
>
> >
> >> From the law you quote it seems to me that 'access to the site' does not
> > include sole possession of it or ability to determine the use of it.
> Just
> > access.  bill w
>
> Yes, but by legally guaranteeing them access, you also automatically
> grant them the right to assemble there as per the 1st Amendment. Most
> of the time when protesters get arrested it is because they are
> trespassing. This does not apply if they are guaranteed access by
> federal law.
>
> They are exercising their 1st Amendment rights strengthened by the
> American Indian Religious Freedom Act and that effectively gives them
> the right to do what they are doing. Legal scholars please correct me
> if I am wrong.


### I don't have to be legal scholar to know that blockading public roads
and committing battery on road users is not allowed by law.

They are violent law-breakers and the police fail to act for political
reasons.

Rafal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20190921/d2f79b20/attachment.htm>